
|
|
|
 |
Over this page have been listed some of the most significant activities that have seen committed Spare Engineerig;
some of them may be relatively far in the time, but all of them are
characterized by relevant professional contents and/or special
operating conditions, such that, the work has involved a more intense,
or at least not ordinary committment.
As sure these are experiences that have completed and improved our professional profile.
Do not hesitate in contact us
for any further clarification it may be required.
 |
 |
Year |
Sub-Contractor |
Main Contractor |
Final Customer |
Location |
2006 |
Basis
Engineering
|
Rosetti
Marino |
Maersk |
Italy |
 |
Industry |
Project |
Oil & Gas - Upstream |
Halfadan
C Platform
|
 |
Development
of detailed instrumentation
engineering, characterized by the implementeation of the Company design
criteria, technical reference standards (e.g. line classes,
equipment selection and installation criterias, etc.), and End
Customer's specific document formats, that obviously where
significantly different from the usual standards. Among the
various performed activities, the more relevant are listed as follow:

equipment engineering
- Technical
Specification &
RDDS drafting for F&G devices;
- Data
Sheet, Inspection
D.S. drafting for F&G devices;
- Technical
Specification &
RDDS drafting for Flow
Indicators;
- Data
Sheet, Inspection
D.S. drafting for Flow
Indicators;
- Technical Specification &
RDDS drafting for Pressure
and Diff.al Pressure Transmitters;
- Data
Sheet, Inspection
D.S. drafting for Pressure
and Differential Pressure Transmitters;
- Technical Specification &
RDDS drafting for Temperature
Transmitters;
- Data
Sheet, Inspection
D.S. drafting for Temperature
Transmitters;
- Technical Specification &
RDDS drafting for BS&W
Monitor;
- Data
Sheet, Inspection
D.S. drafting for BS&W
Monitor;
- Technical Specification &
RDDS drafting for Level
Gauges;
- Data
Sheet, Inspection
D.S. drafting for Level
Gauges;
- Technical Specification &
RDDS drafting for Level
Transmitters;
- Data
Sheet, Inspection
D.S. drafting for Level
Transmitters;
- Technical Specification &
RDDS drafting for Pressure
Gauges;
- Data
Sheet, Inspection
D.S. drafting for Pressure
Gauges;
- Technical Specification &
RDDS drafting for Differential
Pressure Gauges;
- Data
Sheet, Inspection
D.S. drafting for Differential
Pressure Gauges;
- Technical Specification &
RDDS drafting for Coriolis
Flow Transmitters;
- Data
Sheet, Inspection
D.S. drafting for Coriolis
Flow Transmitters;
- Technical Specification &
RDDS drafting for V-Cone
Flow Element;
- Data
Sheet, Inspection
D.S. drafting for V-Cone
Flow Element;
- Technical Specification &
RDDS drafting for Actuated
Valves (2"size and less);
- Data
Sheet, Inspection
D.S. drafting for Actuated
Valves (2"size and less);
- Technical Specification &
RDDS drafting for Surface
Temperature
Transmitters;
- Data
Sheet, Inspection
D.S. drafting for Surface
Temperature
Transmitters;

installation engineering
- instrumentation bulk material MTO drafting and revision;
- instrumentation Primary
and
Secondary Hook-up drafting and revision;
- instrumentation Secondary Electrical Hook-up drafting and revision;
- F&G Secondary Electrical Hook-up drafting and revision;
 
technical evaluation and follow up

- Technical Evaluation and Follow
Up for Multiphase
Flow Meter (MPFM);
- Technical Evaluation and Follow
Up for instrumentation electrical bulk materials MTO;
- Technical Evaluation and Follow
Up for pneumatic and hydraulic bulk materials MTO.

By a later stage (2007), it have also been arranged the instrumental engineering for the Tender EPC related to another platform (Tyra
B), still for Maersk.
|

|
 |
Year |
Sub-Contractor |
Main Contractor |
Final Customer |
Location |
2004-05 |
Basis
Engineering
|
Rosetti
Marino |
Maersk |
Italy |
 |
Industry |
Project |
Oil & Gas - Upstream |
Valdemar
Field Development - Valdemar
AB Platforrm
|
 |
Development
of detailed instrumentation
engineering, characterized by the implementeation of the Company design
criteria, technical reference standards (e.g. line classes, equipment
selection and installation criterias, etc.), and End Customer's
specific document formats, that obviously where significantly different
from the usual standards. Among the various performed activities, the
more relevant are listed as follow:
equipment engineering
- Technical
Specification drafting for Flow Indicators;
- Data
Sheet, Inspection
D.S. drafting for Flow
Indicators;
- Technical
Specification drafting for Pressure
and Differential Pressure Transmitters;
- Data
Sheet, Inspection
D.S. drafting for Pressure
and Differential Pressure Transmitters;
- Technical
Specification drafting for Temperature
Transmitters;
- Data
Sheet, Inspection
D.S. drafting for Temperature
Transmitters;
- Technical
Specification drafting for BS&W
Monitor;
- Data
Sheet, Inspection
D.S. drafting for BS&W
Monitor;

installation engineering
- instrumentation bulk material MTO drafting and revision;
- instrumentation Primary
and
Secondary Hook-up drafting and revision;
- instrumentation Secondary Electrical Hook-up drafting and revision;
 
technical evaluation and follow up

- Technical Evaluation and Follow
Up for Flow Indicators;
- Technical Evaluation and Follow
Up for Pressure and Differential Pressure Transmitters;
- Technical Evaluation and Follow
Up for Temperature
Transmitters;
- Technical Evaluation and Follow
Up for BS&W
Monitor;
- Technical Evaluation and Follow
Up for Multiphase
Flow Meter (MPFM);
- Technical Evaluation and Follow
Up for instrumentation electrical bulk materials MTO;
- Technical Evaluation and Follow
Up for pneumatic and hydraulic bulk materials MTO.

By a later stage, it have also been arranged the instrumental engineering for the Tender EPC related to a further Valdemar field platform (Valdemar
BA), still for Maersk. |
 |
 |
Year |
Sub-Contractor |
Main Contractor |
Final Customer |
Location |
2003 |
ABB
PS & S
|
SARPI |
Sonatrach |
Italy |
 |
Industry |
Project |
Oil & Gas - Upstream
|
Project Traitment d'Huile des Champes BBK / BBKN
|
 |
Activity Description |
Described activites are to be referred to the development of Bir Berkine and Bir Berkine North (BBK & BBKN) production fields, located in Algeria, performed by ABB PS&S for Sonatrach.
Against to what was originally planned, in place of generic
support for the development of the instrumentation engineering activities
implied within the project, duties normally covered by the Project I&C
Leader position were carried out: this is
occurred due to repeated changes of the project task force arranged by the
Client and its operational needs. Due to such reasons, since the early stage of
the project, all duties and activities normally implied by that position have
been carried out, of course, at the Client's premises, as follow:
- project task force coordinated activities, related to all instrumentation field aspects;
- Project
Engineer coordination, and less often, with the Project Manager;
- meetings
periodici interdisciplinari per definizione schedula
attività e verifica avanzamento;
- meetings with End Customer (was a team of Resident Engineers
within Client's premises);
- human resources managment for all instrumentation aspects, with Customer's I&C Manager;
- external human resources (for instrumentation), management and supervision (outsourcing);

In addition to mentioned project management, however, it have also
been proceeded with the operational development of several project documents like the followings:
- Specification
Technique du Système de l'Instrumentation;
- Specification
Technique pour l'Instrumentation des Units Package;
- Specification Technique du
Comptage Multi-Phase de Debit (MPFM);
- Specification
Technique Cuvées Enterrées pour RTU;
and the normal verification activities of produced project literature like, for example:
- P&ID
verification for the instrumentation competence aspects (tagging,
simbology, etc.),;
- outsourcing produced documents verification (Data
Sheets, layouts, etc.);
- SDV e BDV valves pneumatic command typical layout definition;
- tecnical evaluations verification, as also check of several further project documents.
 
Moreover, for all plant packages being interested for instrumental
aspects, (e.g. the relevant gas compression package), all the meetings
with Vendors have been attended (taking care also for the technical
evaluation of some of them, like, for example, the multiphase flow
meter MPFM), ensuring, for
some of them, that all instrumental aspects, since the preliminary
stages of Vendor selection, up to subsequent phases of the kick-off meeting and follow-up, have been properly faced and met. In a second project phase, only after an almost complete performing of
the field instrumentation tasks and duties, it has been required to also cover
the tasks related to the coordination and follow-up to the supply of the plant control system (splitted into DCS, ESD, F&G and Scada, followed, in the early stage by another senior instrumental engineer), due to a new and changed arrangement of the Client's project task
force, which occurred during the latest final stage of the project.
|
 |
 |
Year |
Sub-Contractor |
Main Contractor |
Final Customer |
Location |
2002-03 |
Tecnomare
|
Agip KCO |
N.A. |
Italy |
 |
Industry |
Project |
Oil & Gas - Upstream, Midstream
|
Kashagan Field Development - Experimental
Program
|
 |
Activity Description |
Development
and verification of detailed instrumentation
engineering related to FEEDactivities
implied by the field defined as the more important of the last
decade (estimates as between 9 and 16 billion barrels - source Wikipedia), performed directly at the Client's premises over a relatively long time basis of several months.
Such project developments activities
have been carried out
under the supervision of Client's task forces leaders, and have
required the revision and the completion of a very large
number of
documents, in order to incorporate comments originated both by
the Final Customer,
as also under the internal company review.
 
Significant contributions have been offered for the
preparation, for example, of documents like:

- General
Specification for Instrumentation;
- General
Specification for Packaged Instrumentation;
- Technical
Specification for Wellhead Control Panels,;
- Data
Sheets for all on-off valves (ESV, SDV, BDV, XV and MOV);
- Data Sheets for
Safety Valves;
- Technical
Specification for Fire & Gas System;

Under the squad check
concept, several documents have been verified for the intrumentation
aspects, like, for example, pressurized and atmospheric plant vessels
mechanical Data Sheet, as also several plant packages (e.g. instrument air and nitrogen production packages).
Some further documents have been developed as brand new, like, for example, the multiphase flow meter (MPFM),
as also the pneumatic and pneumo-hydraulic actuated valves command line typical layouts, both for P&ID representation (simplified), as also the detailed one for the actuated valves Local Control Panel Data Sheets.
|
 |
 |
Year |
Sub-Contractor |
Main Contractor |
Final Customer |
Location |
1999 |
ABB
Sae Sadelmi
|
ABB Sae
Sadelmi |
CEGCO |
Italy |
 |
Industry |
Project |
Power Generation |
Aqaba Thermal Power Station, Units 3, 4
& 5
|
 |
Activity Description |
As usual, after the plant start-up and commissioning phases performing, the Handover stage will approach. Obviously, the End Customer may consider to raise
objections about the findings of the plant, asking to Main Contractor
to resolve any gap, or at least to compensate for any plant missed performance, or
lower than the one contractually agreed. Within such operating environment, the management and resolution of a Punch
List, essential to achieve the minimal optimal conditions
required for the subsequent plant hand-over. Such large activity took place over several months, and have been
carried out directly at the Client premises, in close collaboration
with the on site
engineers, as also with the I&C
Manager,
always with the prior approval of the Project Manager.
Due
the nature of mentioned activities, the deep and accurate knowledge of
the contractual documents and correspondence was required, in order to
verify the appropriateness or otherwise of the request of the End Customer, in the absence of which, of course, the argued and appropriate reply was prepared, with the prior approval of P.M. For the justified End Customer
claims, the direct involvement of the relevant sub-contracting (through
meetings between the parties), controlling all the contractual elements
have been performed, as due to such evaluation process, the
sub-supplier was required to provide for recovery or integration of the
missed provision (or part). When the sub-supplier had properly
fullfills its contractual obligations, the fast recovery on the market
of the missed parts or equipments have been performed in order to
achieve and meet the originally agreed features, while investigating
for the best supplier for prices and/or product performance.
For circumstances where was not possible to identify a precise
source of responsibility, or where such adjustment was not
significantly expensive when compared with the intrisic value of the
contested part (or performance), still in consultation with the P.M. were negotiated compensations with the aim to achieve the indispensable End Customer satisfaction, a required condition for the final plant Handover.
After
the progressive depletion of the instrumentation aspects implied by such Punch List, also
the electrical aspects have been carried out as well.
|
 |
 |
Year |
Sub-Contractor |
Main Contractor |
Final Customer |
Location |
1988 |
Ceda
|
Danieli |
JSC Sumy Frunze NPO |
URSS |
 |
Industry |
Project |
Steel - Continuous
Casting |
World largest bloom conticaster (650 x
650 mm) |
 |
Activity Description |
Described activites are to be referred to the development of the drilling rods production plant located in Ukraine, performed by Danieli Group for JSC Sumy Frunze NPO. In detail, PLC site support
engineer activities have been carried, during the start-up and commissioning phases to be related to a continuos casting system (conticaster), under the direct supervision of the site software engineering leader. The PLC control architecture oversaw a complex and innovative concept
of continuous casting (conticaster),
ensuring, among other things, the production of blooms of relevant
sizing,
to be submitted to the next forging hammers action, in order to
get a complete drill rod from a single piece bloom. The top of conticaster
was characterized by the presence of magnetic stirres in molds
(interchangeable, by various sizes, up to 650 x 650 mm), with ingots
all equipped with magnetic stirrers, in order to stabilize the metal
crystal lattice during the solidification.
Another quite innovative solution was the presence of in line oxyacetylene cutting
system, capable to perform cutting by production specified lenghts, operating directly during the bloom vertical descent castings;
such cutted bloom was received on the hydraulic sliding foot on
the the tipping group, and accompanied to the lower point, and
then turned of 90° in order to move to the next step of horizontal
machining. Thanks to this innovative solution have been possible
to avoid the usual "curvature" of the
casted blooms (often considered as detrimental for the final metal
cristalline structure quality, expecially for large size bloom).
By the above performed tasks description, it can be easily understood
that the PLC configuration was completed by a relevant number of axis
positioning card, encoder reading cards, motion
controls, as the true coordination between all the involved conticaster equipment units (mold, oxyacetylene
cutting
system hydraulic tipper motor), providing also for the necessary safe
operations with tons of hot metal (part of which melted into the mold);
to understand the nature of possible risks, it would be enough to
imagine the possible consequences of a premature tipper action, in case
the oxyacetylene
cutting
system has not yet finished its cutting action. A significant number of
interlocks and safety solutions were in fact developed and implemented
directly in the field, during the demanding stages of commissioning.
Obviously, due the mentioned coordination with other plant production
sections (e.g. for the setting of the next production process), under
the Host supervision (e.g. management of informations related to production lots, etc,), the PLC was completed by several communication card modules.
|
 |
 |
Year |
Sub-Contractor |
Main Contractor |
Final Customer |
Location |
1987-88
|
Carlo Gavazzi
Impianti |
Saipem
|
SCOP (NPO)
|
Iraq |

|
Industry |
Project |
Oil & Gas - Midstream |
2nd ITP (Iraq
Turkey Pipeline) Expansion |
 |
Activity Description |
The project refers to what, since '70 years, was perhaps the most important oil pipeline in Iraq, most recently know as the Kirkuk-Ceyhan Pipeline, that repeated sabotage, since 2003, and the major explosion in october 2009, near Mosul,
have virtually caused the definitive closing (the new Iraqi government
is in fact considering the possibility of alternative routes through
the governorates of Erbil and Dahuk, less susceptible to tampering (source Wikipedia).
Such project (2nd ITP Expansion, where ITP shall be assumed as Iraq-Turkey Pipeline),
was planned for the implementation of a second 46" pipeline, in
addition to the existing 40". By a previous revamping action (1st IPT Expansion), the existing pumping station working on such 40" pipeline, were pratically doubled, consequently, by the 2nd ITP Expansion
was planned to switch such latest pumping stations over the new
46" pipeline. These same "new" pumping stations were also
completed for pig launching and receiving traps stations, for the
cleaning of the new pipeline. By such new plant configuration,
the original pipeline was definitelly splitted into two lines, both
capable to be managed entirely by the remote control system (TDC2000 Yamatake Honeywell RTU), or locally, through the control room of each pumping station. The coordination and control in automatic remote (RTU), local semi-automatic and manual for both pipelines, as also the new pig launching and receiving traps handling, were deployed on PLC.
In an early stage and following to a reasonable time period of project introduction
held at the Client's headquarters of Marcallo, it have been reached the
installation site as software leader, where, in accordance to the
original plans, were to be aquitted for the set-up and the commissioning
activities related to the software of different PLC (installed in each
pipeline pumping station), and the verification of the proper
communication with the tankfarm
supervisor (remote RTU). It should be noted that the pipeline represented a significant military objective (at that time Iraq was at war with Iran),
which never should have been stopped, and never can go under shut down
(such oil export pipeline was as sure among the most profitable source
of the country). Consequently, such start-up and commisioning
actions were possible to be performed only for limited operating
sequence portions, preferably under controlled conditions (actuators
and remote coordination sectioned),
by partial pumping station sections verification (e.g. launching and receiving pig traps alone), or during
scheduled maintenance or accidental opportunities, during any
plant failure. In addition to such limited operability, further
difficulties have been originated by the poor and inadequate
availability of documents related the
existing
plant sections (almost never updated "as built"), and at
last, initial surveys performed not enough deeply, led to numerous and
substantial design changes to the software originally prepared at the Client's premises; such changes have been required by a relatively intransigent End Customer (virtually militarized). Moreover, many of hardwired
signals required for the proper fusion with the existing control system
had to be taken from existing old relay logic control room panels, that
previous survey had not properly identified, mapped, tested, and/or for
which, many of the drawings in the hand of End Customer,
were not updated (signals not shown). For these reasons, with
all of such difficulties operating environment (for example,
almost all correspondance, minutes of meetings, etc. have been hand
written), the new operating sequences have been agreed, together with
the reference engineering company (Lummus Crest/Protech joint
venture), and the End Customer, by repeated meetings performed on site, sometimes in presence of
the Main Contractor's
officials.
For
consistency with the new control strategies adopted and implemented on
the Iraqi side of the pipeline, interfacing stages have
been performed also on the Turkish side of the pipeline, in order
to implement, also inside such PLCs, the same operating sequences.

|
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|